{"id":736,"date":"2026-08-10T23:18:08","date_gmt":"2026-08-10T21:18:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/?p=736"},"modified":"2026-08-10T23:37:50","modified_gmt":"2026-08-10T21:37:50","slug":"le-sort-du-pavillon-de-lassemblee-nationale-vire-au-tragi-comique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/index.php\/2026\/08\/10\/le-sort-du-pavillon-de-lassemblee-nationale-vire-au-tragi-comique\/","title":{"rendered":"Le Sort du pavillon de l&rsquo;Assembl\u00e9e Nationale vire au tragi-comique"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"679\" src=\"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/032_Pavillon_Assemblee_Nationale-1024x679.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-740\" srcset=\"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/032_Pavillon_Assemblee_Nationale-1024x679.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/032_Pavillon_Assemblee_Nationale-300x199.jpg 300w, https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/032_Pavillon_Assemblee_Nationale-768x509.jpg 768w, https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/032_Pavillon_Assemblee_Nationale-1536x1018.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/032_Pavillon_Assemblee_Nationale-2048x1358.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/032_Pavillon_Assemblee_Nationale-91x60.jpg 91w, https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/032_Pavillon_Assemblee_Nationale-800x530.jpg 800w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le projet de nouveau pavillon d\u2019accueil en verre (52,8 M\u20ac), qui doit remplacer l\u2019existant de 1888, relance la pol\u00e9mique. Trop cher, criard\u2026 la <a href=\"https:\/\/www.change.org\/p\/non-%C3%A0-l-enlaidissement-de-paris-par-l-assembl%C3%A9e-nationale?recruited_by_id=bb054080-93c5-11f1-b1eb-07c8ca058492&amp;utm_source=share_petition&amp;utm_campaign=share_petition&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;share_id=DCJQt5qtBq\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.change.org\/p\/non-%C3%A0-l-enlaidissement-de-paris-par-l-assembl%C3%A9e-nationale?recruited_by_id=bb054080-93c5-11f1-b1eb-07c8ca058492&amp;utm_source=share_petition&amp;utm_campaign=share_petition&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;share_id=DCJQt5qtBq\">p\u00e9tition de Sites &amp; Monuments d\u00e9passe maintenant les 100 000 signatures<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Curieusement, l\u2019alternative port\u00e9e par ceux qui d\u2019habitude d\u00e9fendent le vieux Paris avec brio et bravoure n\u2019est autre que la vision de l\u2019agence SANAA &#8211; celle-l\u00e0 m\u00eame qui a d\u00e9figur\u00e9 la Samaritaine c\u00f4t\u00e9 rue de Rivoli &#8211; avec un tr\u00e8s disgracieux cube que d\u2019aucuns appr\u00e9cieront.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Que cette pol\u00e9mique cesse, qui ridiculise \u00e0 la fois :<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>nos d\u00e9put\u00e9s (le Bureau de l\u2019Assembl\u00e9e, o\u00f9 tous les groupes sont repr\u00e9sent\u00e9s, a approuv\u00e9 ce projet \u00e0 l\u2019unanimit\u00e9),<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>et les d\u00e9fenseurs du patrimoine, qui cherchent \u00e0 se montrer constructifs en commentant une grossi\u00e8re maladresse.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Deux solutions pourtant simples :<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>La plus raisonnable : ce caprice du Parlement, en cette p\u00e9riode de difficult\u00e9 des finances publiques, doit \u00eatre abandonn\u00e9.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Si vraiment l\u2019on tient \u00e0 quelque chose\u2026 une sur\u00e9l\u00e9vation en harmonie avec l\u2019existant. Quelques minutes d\u2019IA ont l\u2019air de rivaliser avec les plus grands cabinets.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Un \u00e9tage de plus en harmonie avec l\u2019existant, ou rien. Et qu\u2019on n\u2019en parle plus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le projet de nouveau pavillon d\u2019accueil en verre (52,8 M\u20ac), qui doit remplacer l\u2019existant de 1888, relance la pol\u00e9mique. Trop cher, criard\u2026 la p\u00e9tition de Sites &amp; Monuments d\u00e9passe maintenant les 100 000 signatures. Curieusement, l\u2019alternative port\u00e9e par ceux qui &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog","latest_post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=736"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":742,"href":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736\/revisions\/742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regardnaif.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}